I am in total agreement, this approach seems inherently flawed. I was enthralled with this concept initiative over a year ago, especially the way they were structuring the OS based on common symbols to help make the machines usage more universally understandable. I was not aware of this new development, thank you for that. I thought that this project had already achieved their funding efforts?! And I thought that the project was going to be able to get the laptops in the Hundred dollar range which makes me questions this $399 price tag for 2? Should it not be 4? If you have more information beyond the above please post that as well.
Join our network of non-profits, companies and individuals who believe social change can happen through design.
Become A MemberPopular Blogs
- richard crown
5 Votes / 1 Posts - Karin Seifert
3 Votes / 6 Posts - Aether Phanes
3 Votes / 4 Posts - Natalie Marco
2 Votes / 4 Posts
Most Active Members
- Kate Andrews
321 Recent Posts - v-neeta
289 Recent Posts - steven landau
157 Recent Posts - Douglas Best
126 Recent Posts
Recent Work Samples
- James Brown
- Rodrigo Brenner
Designer (Product Design) - Aurora Colon
Designer (Graphic Design) - Pitzer Answers
CEO
People
Back to ListingMalys Aaron
Buffalo, NY, United States
Designer (Art Direction)
Member since September 22, 2008
-
Strategy Flawed?!
Education
In response to New approach to One Laptop Per Child: Get 1, Give 1, posted by Sarah Lidgus,
in the thread New approach to One Laptop Per Child: Get 1, Give 1Posted October 23, 2008
By Malys Aaron
- Chronological
- Most Popular
My Interests
- Industrial Design
- Environmental Design
- Communication Design
- Fashion Design
- Audio/Visual Design