Design 21: Social Design Network

NEEDS

ARGUMENTS

tanx

CREATESCAPE

Thesis Board

tanx

CREATESCAPE

Thesis Board

tanx

At this point in my thesis journey it seems that I have a valid design concept. Out of 10 reviews 5 see very little promise and 5 see great promise.

It is clear that my research is weak and not presented well.

Not all of research has made its way into a presentable form.

As one reviewer commented, it seems I have been stuck in a research rut.

My focus has been on sound,but not a clear focus. I've been picking a variety of ingredients but haven't until now understood what dish I was making.

My initial questionings revolved around the psychology of sound, wondering how I could convince somehow that sound was affecting their cognition. What have I been trying to prove? I've been attempting to build a case against the inequality of sound transmission. Defining sound users as an involuntary,and a voluntary audience.

The involuntary audience, is everyone whom sound comes into contact with. This is noise that equates the ambient sound around us, the unpredictable, the inevitable, and unavoidable sounds we are subjected to.

The voluntary audience, I have defined as those whom are making sound purposefully, whether it be through speech, an instrument, or speakers.

The voluntary audience suffers inequality, because we all have the right to a quite environment, but we don't have the right to make "unreasonable" noise. Playing an instrument can constitute as unreasonable noise.

What my thought process has been is that we all need to make noise, some more than...

At this point in my thesis journey it seems that I have a valid design concept. Out of 10 reviews 5 see very little promise and 5 see great promise.

It is clear that my research is weak and not presented well.

Not all of research has made its way into a presentable form.

As one reviewer commented, it seems I have been stuck in a research rut.

My focus has been on sound,but not a clear focus. I've been picking a variety of ingredients but haven't until now understood what dish I was making.

My initial questionings revolved around the psychology of sound, wondering how I could convince somehow that sound was affecting their cognition. What have I been trying to prove? I've been attempting to build a case against the inequality of sound transmission. Defining sound users as an involuntary,and a voluntary audience.

The involuntary audience, is everyone whom sound comes into contact with. This is noise that equates the ambient sound around us, the unpredictable, the inevitable, and unavoidable sounds we are subjected to.

The voluntary audience, I have defined as those whom are making sound purposefully, whether it be through speech, an instrument, or speakers.

The voluntary audience suffers inequality, because we all have the right to a quite environment, but we don't have the right to make "unreasonable" noise. Playing an instrument can constitute as unreasonable noise.

What my thought process has been is that we all need to make noise, some more than...

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.designboom.com/tools/WPro/images/12n/cn3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://jingjunk.blogspot.com/200803_01archive.html&usg=_s22oO8M9MWkE3DfLTT350Qz94Ko=&h=390&w=550&sz=26&hl=en&start=19&um=1&tbnid=4kpFGvHe30a4M:&tbnh=94&tbnw=133&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfelt%2Bchair%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den-us%26sa%3DN

.

.

Cocoon 3

Materials: Sound absorbing, fabric, Felt, sound insulation.

Matte finish

Production proccess: Molding Sewn Glued Compressed Sealed Sprayed Coated

CoCoon 2

Materials: TAC Board Foams

Production Processes: Thermoforming casting Molding