Design 21: Social Design Network

I submitted my designs, but I am not a finalist, is not a problem for me, but I agree entirely with those who say that all the designs participants should be submitted to a vote of the public on the Internet, and judges who would be selected from among 161 designs (10% in 1607 approximately) if the organizers are not agree with any of the 10 designs, it would give the award to the ten best, and would have every right to choose among the designs, which most interests them, it is even possible based on the designs submitted to a more tailored to what they want, THIS IS THE WAY IT IS JUSTICE, FOLLOWING UP WITH PROVIDED (the word offered and the commitment fulfilled worth more qe any institution) ... I do not want to overly pessimistic ... but even if I do not believe this is so, perhaps the next design21 is very poor professional, knowing what happened, few of the good ones, return to the competition ... We would like to strongly seek ways to be fair and reward the effort.

"This is not an exercise by vox populi."

• 78 countrys and 1607 entries "doesnot vox populi" ??

"If they feel it represents them and their goals, that is all that matters"

• Efecctivement, "their 8 goals of millenium" !!

• Have every right to choose the logo as a private institution wishing, but not represent 78 countries participating ...

• I say always with the greatest respect that we have among us all.

They should answer the question:

Do you believe that "8 Millennium Goals" we show in this logo that uses two quotes?

If a logo does not identify the desired goal, (8 Millennium Goals) it does not fully meet the role entrusted to convey the message.

I agree to be abstract, but is not the kind of language that the public understands common and wild ...

To my mind, he had to win one of the logos UNDERLINES the 8 Millennium Goals, because Film Festivals exist in many parts, but 8 Millennium goals I do not think ...

See and answer, the logo "win"